<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>AI on Oliver Hudson</title>
    <link>https://oliverhudson.com/tags/ai/</link>
    <description>Recent content in AI on Oliver Hudson</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>© Oliver Hudson</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://oliverhudson.com/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>When RAG Goes Wrong: Notes from Building a Naive System</title>
      <link>https://oliverhudson.com/posts/when-rag-goes-wrong/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://oliverhudson.com/posts/when-rag-goes-wrong/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I built a basic RAG system over Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s documentation last week to develop hands-on intuition about where these systems actually break. The system was deliberately simple — fixed-size character chunks, OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s &lt;code&gt;text-embedding-3-large&lt;/code&gt;, Pinecone for storage, top-5 retrieval. No reranking, no hybrid search, no clever chunking. The point wasn&amp;rsquo;t to build something good; it was to see what fails when you don&amp;rsquo;t.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s what I found.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;failure-1-vocabulary-similarity-is-not-relevance&#34;&gt;Failure 1: Vocabulary similarity is not relevance&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I asked the system &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;What&amp;rsquo;s the difference between system prompts and developer messages?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt; Developer messages aren&amp;rsquo;t standard Anthropic terminology, but the system returned chunks from the system prompt documentation anyway — because they shared vocabulary with the query, not because they addressed it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
